Canadian archeologist Russell Adams's interest is in Bronze Age
and Iron Age copper production. He never intended to walk into
archeology's vicious debate over the historical accuracy of the Old
Testament -- a conflict likened by one historian to a pack of feral
canines at each other's throats.
Yet by coincidence, Prof. Adams of Hamilton's McMaster University
says, he and an international team of colleagues fit into place a
significant piece of the puzzle of human history in the Middle East
-- unearthing information that points to the existence of the
Bible's vilified Kingdom of Edom at precisely the time the Bible
says it existed, and contradicting widespread academic belief that
it did not come into being until 200 years later.
Their findings mean that those scholars convinced that the Hebrew
Old Testament is at best a compendium of revisionist, fragmented
history, mixed with folklore and theology, and at worst a piece of
outright propaganda, likely will have to apply the brakes to their
thinking.
Because, if the little bit of the Old Testament's narrative that
Prof. Adams and his colleagues have looked at is true, other bits
could be true as well.
References to the Kingdom of Edom -- almost none of them
complimentary -- are woven through the Old Testament. It existed in
what is today southern Jordan, next door to Israel, and the
relationship between the biblical Edomites and Israelites was one of
unrelenting hostility and warfare.
The team led by Prof. Adams, Thomas Levy of the University of
California at San Diego and Mohammad Najjar of the Jordanian
Department of Antiquities was investigating copper mining and
smelting at a site called Khirbat en-Nahas, by far the largest
copper-production site in the region.
They applied high-precision radiocarbon-dating methods to some of
their finds, and as they say in the British journal Antiquity,
"The results were spectacular."
They firmly established that occupation of the site began in the
11th century BC and a monumental fortress was built in the 10th
century BC, supporting the argument for existence of an Edomite
state at least 200 years earlier than had been assumed.
What is particularly exciting about their find is that it implies
the existence of an Edomite state at the time the Bible says King
David and his son Solomon ruled over a powerful united kingdom of
Israel and Judah.
It is the historical accuracy -- the very existence of this
united kingdom and the might and splendour of David and Solomon, as
well as the existence of surrounding kingdoms -- that lies at the
heart of the archaeological dispute.
Those scholars known as minimalists argue that what is known as
"state formation" -- the emergence of regional governments and kings
-- did not take place in the area until the imperialistic expansion
of the Assyrian empire in the 8th century BC, so David and Solomon,
rather than being mighty monarchs, were mere petty chieftains.
And because everything that takes place in the Middle East
inevitably is political, the minimalist argument is seen as
weakening modern Israel's claim to Palestine.
In the biblical narrative, the Edomites are the descendents of
Esau, whose blessing from his father, Isaac, was stolen by his
younger brother, Jacob, ancestor of the Israelites. (Fans of the
British satirical-comedy group Beyond the Fringe will recall how
Jacob pulled off the theft by presenting himself as the hirsute Esau
to their blind father, saying in an aside: "My brother Esau is an
hairy man, but I am a smooth man.")
The Edomites are lambasted in the Bible for refusing to let the
Israelites rest on their land as they flee Egypt. God declares
obscurely: "Over Edom will I cast out my shoe." The Israelites
grumble enviously that there were kings of Edom before there were
kings of Israel -- a highly significant passage because it implies
that state formation occurred in Edom before it happened in
Israel.
Finally, there is the biblical account of David's war against the
Edomites, in which David and his general, Joab, kill 18,000 Edomites
and establish military control over them by "putting garrisons
throughout all Edom."
Irish scholar John Bartlett, one of the world's great experts on
the Edomites, dates the battle at 990 to 980 BC, precisely when
Prof. Adams and his colleagues date the fortress.
Says Prof. Adams: "This battle between the Israelites and the
Edomites, although not possible to document, is typical of the sort
of border conflicts between Iron Age states. And the evidence of our
new dates at least proves that it may, in fact, be possible to place
the Edomites in the 10th century [BC] or earlier, which now supports
the chronology of the biblical accounts.
"It is intriguing that at Khirbat en-Nahas, our large Iron Age
fort is dated to just this period, suggesting conflict as a central
concern even at a remote copper-production site."
He concludes: "We're not out to prove the Bible right or wrong.
We're not trying to be controversial. We're just trying to be good
anthropologists and scientists, and tell the story of our
archeological site."